LAPIDAR

Glossary for independent insurance agencies

Early access

Glossary · Insurance agency commissions

Agency code (producer code)

An agency code, often called a producer code, is the identifier a carrier assigns to an agency, and sometimes to each office or producer in it, to record which policies the agency placed and to issue its commission statements.

By Lapidar, the team building it · · Also called producer code; agent code; agency number; sub-code

What it means

Carriers use the code to record whose business a policy is. It goes on the application, stays on the policy record and decides which statement the commission lands on. Names and formats vary by carrier: producer code, agent number, agency number. Some carriers also issue sub-codes under a master code for branches or for individual producers. The code is the carrier’s own reference, separate from a producer’s license number.

An agency often holds several codes with one carrier: its direct appointment, a code through an aggregator, codes inherited in an acquisition, and producer sub-codes. Who owns a code matters if you leave a network. Tiffany Overlease, writing in IA Magazine on whether to join an independent agency alliance, puts “Who owns the codes?” on her list of questions to ask first, and says you need to determine “whether you own your carrier code should you decide to leave.”

How it shows on a commission statement

Carriers issue statements per code. Several codes mean several statements, sometimes paid together in one deposit. The code usually sits in the statement header, and some carriers repeat it on each line. When a policy is written or renewed under another code, the carrier pays it on that code’s statement, and on yours it looks missing. Producer pay keyed to sub-codes inherits the same errors: a policy under the wrong sub-code credits the wrong producer until someone moves it.

Example

Example data: one agency’s two codes with Carrier 07, an invented carrier, in one month.
PolicyAMS codePaid codeResult
EX-29014EX-AC-0412EX-AC-0412OK, carrier statement
EX-29027EX-AC-0412EX-AC-7730Renewal on the network statement
EX-29033EX-AC-7730EX-AC-7730OK, network statement

Checked against the direct statement alone, EX-29027 looks like a missing renewal. The commission arrived on the network statement, net of the network’s share. Two questions follow: which code should the policy sit under, and is the smaller amount what you agreed to?

Common mistakes to check

  • Checking one code’s statement against the whole book, so policies placed under another code show as missing.
  • Codes not set up in your agency management system, so transactions under them match no policy.
  • Codes inherited in an acquisition that nobody watches. Their statements can keep arriving unread, or stop without anyone noticing.

Sources

Lapidar is commission reconciliation software for independent insurance agencies, in development. Related: why carriers stop paying renewal commissions.

Reconciling statements is the hard part.

Every carrier formats its statements differently, and the lines rarely match your records on the first pass. Lapidar is what we’re building for that. It’s in development, so there’s nothing to try yet. The early-access list hears first, when agencies can upload their statements.

We’ll write once, when the first agencies can upload their statements.